Critics of Al Gore believe that the former vice president should not receive a Nobel Prize for his efforts regarding global warming - including his film "An Inconvenient Truth" - but should perhaps get an award for his efforts as a climate change propagandist."The real 'inconvenient truth' is that Gore seems to have intentionally omitted it from his movie," Steve Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com, charged in a news release on Thursday. Instead, the film presented "false facts" and major inaccuracies that fit the Democrat's personal agenda, he said.Milloy pointed to a ruling last week in a British court that "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least nine material falsehoods and can be shown to students only if it is identified as containing "partisan political views" that promote only one side of the global warming argument.
WOW, Al Gore shares the Nobel Peace Prize but where has he been sewing and promoting peace in the world????
All he has done is promote fear and lies with his GLOBAL WARMINGPSEUDO RELIGION. AT LEAST 11 ITEMS IN HIS INCONVIENT TRUTH FILM HAS BEEN PROVEN A HOAX BY TOP CLIMATE WARMING EXPERTS. I WANT AL GORE TO PROVE THAT HURRICANE KATRINA WAS CAUSED BY CLIMATE WARMING. HE CANNOT PROVE THIS AND HE KNOW THIS.
Then on Thursday, the BBC aired a report claiming that Gore knew his "alarmist" movie presented "false facts," because he feared any uncertainty in his film would only fuel opponents of global warming regulation."If this is true," said Milloy, "then Al Gore should win the Nobel prize for propaganda.""The BBC report and the judge's ruling came as no surprise," he said. "Our YouTube video 'debate', entitled "Al Gore Debates Global Warming," between Gore and expert climatologists spotlights the false assertion by Gore that carbon dioxide drives global temperature."
Waco Chemical & Supply Co., preserving the environment through chemical research, chemical recycling and EARTHKLEEN and EcoSMART chemical products.